Mesosphere’s ‘Container 2.0’ Unites Stateless and Stateful Workloads

47

The argument over the viability of stateful container-based applications versus stateless ones is long settled. In real-world multi-tenant production environments, applications need access to persistent data stores and volumes. Its ridiculous to make developers jump through hoops even open-source, device-agnostic, standardized hoops so that they can send messages or record entries in a key/value store or a log file.

Mesosphere has a worked out a way to manage both stateful and stateless container workloads, along with workloads not even using containers, all on the same shared infrastructure, using DC/OS (Mesosphere’s Data Center Operating System) both the commercial and open source editions.

The trick is to allow some distributed programs handle their own scheduling. Container orchestrators, such as Kubernetes and the Docker Engine, use a single “monolithic,” scheduler, noted Florian Leibert, Mesospheres CEO, in a blog post. “Because there is no single scheduler that can optimize for all workloads, users end up with non-optimal operating constraints, including being forced to create separate clusters for each service,” he wrote.

Read more at  The New Stack