Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
You have known for months that as soon as Microsoft got a chance they’d
be back at their old tricks. You knew they wanted to convert the Web into
another proprietary platform, you just weren’t sure how they’d do it. Was it
the .NET initiative? Or was Hailstorm the center of the company’s plans? Well, it
turns out that Microsoft’s plan is surprisingly simple. It may work. And it is
nearly guaranteed to get Microsoft another court date.The reason that Microsoft will almost certainly land back in court
is based on its newest stranglehold in the PC market, and what it has
chosen to do with its advantage. Over the last 18 months or so, Internet
Explorer has succeeded Netscape as the de facto standard platform for accessing
the Web on 90% of all personal computers. This represents a significant
win for Microsoft as it means that Microsoft has built the IE franchise
into yet another monopoly. In many ways the Internet browser is the
Web equivalent of the client operating system. It is the platform on
which other applications run. To own the Web browser franchise gives
Microsoft a new monopoly — a second platform to control. What it is doing with
that new monopoly is a stunner.
Microsoft has announced that Internet Explorer 6.0 will not support
Java, and it won’t support plug-ins unless they are built on Microsoft’s
Active X technology. The impact on Web development may be severe.
The withdrawal of support for plug-ins will have a stifling effect.
While the dot-bomb implosion has slowed the development of plug-ins,
there are dozens if not hundreds of popular Web based programs that run using
plug-ins. Plug-ins have introduced the Web community to hundreds of
multimedia applications ranging from streaming audio and video to read-only text
and image content. In many ways, plug-ins are the equivalent of client
side applications in a Web environment. Cutting them off without a
rational explanation is the equivalent of Microsoft trying to sabotage all PC
applications that didn’t use a Microsoft programming language.
The attempt to throw up barriers to Java development is even more
blatant. In recent years, Java has become the most widely used of all
programming languages. Given that Java is open and essentially free, many colleges
use it as the core of their first year programming courses. Java is at
the heart of thousands of small Web-based applications and countless
Web-centric enterprise programs. It is the “other” open platform — in some
ways it is more important to the notion of open development than Linux.
Throwing barriers up to discourage Java programming hardly enhances any
innovations, unless you count the spin that Microsoft’s lawyers and PR
staffers will have to generate in order to justify this outrage.
The message to software developers couldn’t be more clear; develop on
any platform other than a Microsoft product, and you risk your application.
Whatever Microsoft’s earlier transgressions, the company never
attempted to cut off all other competing software from running on its operating
system. This is because, despite Microsoft’s dominance of office
applications, it knew that it could not afford to alienate developers of home-grown
enterprise software packages. The company has never imagined that it could develop
every application its clients might need. It simply chose to pick off
the most popular. It built software programming tools that took advantage
of characteristics of the Microsoft platform that were unfamiliar to its
competition, but it never took steps to actively prevent programs compiled using
Borland C++ from running on a Windows platform.
This time, Microsoft is interfering with the development of an open
platform. It is sabotaging a software development process that gave the
Web much of its present richness. Why? Microsoft apologists claim that
it is an attempt to provide additional security, but that’s laughable.
There’s nothing in ActiveX that provides any additional security
to anything, save perhaps Microsoft’s bottom line.
The antitrust implications of Microsoft’s IE6 initiative seems plain
enough. It is yet another case of Microsoft developing a monopoly and
using it to strangle potential threats to its operating system by throwing up
barriers to compel the larger community to use Microsoft platforms,
like them or not. Most commercial web site developers are unlikely
to risk anything that that would confuse site visitors. The market is
tough enough already. It will not take much pressure to convince them that
they have to build on ActiveX and C# platforms.
Microsoft may claim that no one is being forced to use IE6 (they did
detach it from the core operating system!). The company and its lawyers and its PR
types and its assortment of apologists will certainly insist that this newest
gambit is unrelated to Microsoft’s earlier anticompetitive hijinks.
However, it springs from the same corporate culture and a mindset that prefers
to use strong-arm tactics and coercion rather than superior products to
dominate its market space. This time, the stakes aren’t just an operating system
but the Web itself.
Individual users may rebel against using IE6, or even Microsoft
products. That’s likely the case with the majority of NewsForge
readers. However, most commercial Web site developers are not going to risk any
possibility that users may stay with an IE platform. Whether they want
to or not, the bulk of them will develop using Microsoft products and
platforms, unless someone knows a good lawyer.
Author: JT Smith
It wasn’t until introduced to Art Spiegelman‘s, Maus, that I truly
understood the power of the comic strip medium. I read it for a class on
WWII with a concentration on the Holocaust. I went to purchase my books for
the semester, normally a pile of thick texts with small print and an arduous
table of content, but when I located Maus my curiosity was piqued and I read
through the first pages before even making my way to the register. It
wasn’t on the syllabus but I bought Maus II anyway.
Below one of the User Friendly
strips posted at the Daily
Static, a reader responds, “I don’t think A.J.’s taken his hands out of
his pockets for days!”
The calling of the cartoonist is to artfully combine sketch and text to
reveal more about his or her society than any other medium. In this time of
revolution it is J.D. Frazer, also known as Illiad, the author of User
Friendly, who captures the subtleties of the geek rise.
Perhaps, just the way comic strip authors use humor and illustration to
create enough distance to perceive serious issues, it is Frazer’s self-proclaimed status as geek, but not techie, that enables him to so clearly
capture the nuances of the techie experience.
Three years ago, Frazer responded to the strange cross-section of
personalities inherent in any company that offers a high-tech service to the
general public, by doodling. It was clear that the work was based on
himself and the employees that surrounded him at Paralynx, an ISP he
started with friend and business partner Bob Carlson, but nobody seemed to
care and his co-workers insisted it be posted to share with a wider audience.
Roughly three years later, UserFriendly.org is negotiating its first round
of funding and Frazer finds himself in the center of unsolicited attention.
He is adamant about attributing the success of User Friendly to the
company that surrounds him, but it is Frazer himself that fans want to know
about. For him, it’s a reality that has taken some getting used to.
“What I’ve done is given people a glimpse into the way I think. I didn’t
even realize that until about a year into this. I sat down with a bunch of
fans and I was meekly sitting in the corner sipping my pop and people
started trying to get information out of me. They realized I was having a
little bit of difficulty so they explained to me what it is that they were
doing and I thought, ‘oh, OK, that makes sense.’ ”
The evolution of his experience with U.F. is marked with this kind of
holistic relationship. Technically, spiritually, contentually, U.F. is
collaboration, a community effort, an Open Source project. Each new strip
is followed by the Slashdot-type feedback function and Frazer often sits
down with fans for brainstorming sessions. But he relies on them for more
than just ideas.
“I get humbled every day and I’m thankful for it. The geek community is
very outspoken. They have no problem giving their opinion on just about
anything.”
It is important to him that he stay grounded. User Friendly gives him a
good vantage point from which to view the geek awakening and, like any drug,
power has fostered both good and evil.
“For so long [geeks] have been told how awful they are, and now some big
and powerful companies are telling them they’re wonderful, they can’t live
without them and handing them bags of money. Egos grow disproportionately.
I’m seeing a lot of vanity. It’s not running rampant through geek society
but I’m seeing it in larger numbers than I have before.”
But in what seems to be characteristic Frazer, he’s not angry or
vindictive, he’s worried that “when the bubble bursts these people are going
to fall hard,” he’s afraid they’ll get hurt.
Though an only child, it’s this brotherly concern that has always guided
him.
“I was a pretty good chemistry student and one thing I learned was to
make paint bombs. There was a bully a few neighborhoods over that was
picking on one of my friends. I went to the store and selected the most
garish paint I could find, made a bomb, and set it next to his car. He had
no idea who did it but boy was he pissed. I felt really good after that.”
I asked him if he might use User Friendly to try to put down some of
those inflating egos.
“Not having a syndicate and a team of editors filtering each strip is a
real departure from regular cartooning. Quite frankly, if I’m going to put
something up that is a part of me and I’m going to do something wrong I’d
rather do that and learn from it.
“But I am constantly asking myself, ‘if I do this am I going to hurt
anyone?’ Offending people and hurting people are two different things. I
think it was Matt Groening who said if you don’t offend at least a few
people then you’re doing something wrong.”
You’d think all this responsibility would weigh down on him. but he’s
having a great time. When it all gets in the way of his creativity and he
finds himself blocked, he just grabs a backpack and hops in his truck, then
returns a few days later and dives back into work.
It’s not that he has a travel bug, which is surprising considering that
before his family settled in Vancouver when he was age 10, his father’s job as a senior
captain for shipping lines led the Frazers to spend extended periods in
China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia. It’s just that he has an
insatiable curiosity. Every now and then he’s got to go explore.
It’s the same reason he can only work at home and at the User Friendly
office which is in Vancouver, right across the hall from Paralynx. By
submerging himself in utter familiarity, he can focus that energy on creating
the imaginary world of Columbia Internet.
Cartooning is a perfect synergy of his intellectual and social leanings.
He reads, writes poetry, has two hard science fiction books in the works but
he also loves to engage in role-playing games and insists that the games
being developed for User Friendly be multi-user Web-based games.
When role playing, he is not content to strut his mental prowess as a
player but often volunteers as the game master or referee, the one who, just
like in cartooning, creates a world for other people to explore.
Long after the struggles between operating systems is worked out, long
after people stop referring to BSD and Linux separately, people will pull Evil Geniuses, and User Friendly off the
shelf in the history section to read the inside story of the techie
revolution.
Expect the next compilation of strips to include essays from Frazer
himself.
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
